Messages

1

Installation and Upgrades / Re: Choosing right DNS server

« on: November 06, 2012, 11:03:30 pm »

Thanks

2

Installation and Upgrades / Choosing right DNS server

« on: October 27, 2012, 07:09:32 pm »

Hi,

This is my LAN setup:

• 192.168.1.1 - pfsense 2.0.1 (gateway) acting as DNS forwarder and DHCP server for LAN clients
  
• 192.168.1.2 - zentyal 3.0 (office PDC) also acting as DNS server for domain controller.

I ended up with two DNS (forwarders) servers. I still want to use 192.168.1.1 as only DNS server, but to join and use win clients with PDC, second one (192.168.1.2) has to be used.

I ended up with this solution. I setup 192.168.1.2 as DNS server on win clients. Then forward DNS requests on 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.1.1, and from 192.168.1.1 to Internet. Aldo this is working, I have problem resolving FQDN for local hosts:
This works

Code: [Select]

nslookup win1but this

Code: [Select]

nslookup win1.home.lan isn't.


I also tried another solution, to add dns record in primary (192.168.1.1) DNS server so that home.lan points to 192.168.1.2. Aldo dns resolution worked properly, win clients didn't found domain controller (join was not working).

Is there a better, nicer solution?

thanks

3

Installation and Upgrades / Re: ERROR: relation "samba_access_report" does not exist

« on: February 01, 2011, 09:46:28 pm »

Hi there,

Try using our latest stable version 2.0, please upgrade to that version.

hmm, I have latest stable version 2.0, but sill getting this message. 

4

Installation and Upgrades / Re: Master/Slave Samba Shares and User Accounts

« on: October 11, 2010, 10:27:25 pm »

I has a similar problem and solve it creating in slave a group __USERS__ and add user ebox into __USERS__.

Didn't help me.

5

Installation and Upgrades / Re: Master/Slave Samba Shares and User Accounts

« on: October 10, 2010, 06:33:10 pm »

I have the same problem. Other services (for example Radius) are working on my slave server, but file sharing doesn't.

If I do ldapsearch to view the ldap groups, I can see the __USERS__ group.

If I do on the slave shell:

$ id username

id: username: No such user

Is it a bug?

I can confirm this behavior. Same problems. Bug?

6

Installation and Upgrades / "Reinstall" Zentyal file server on new HW

« on: October 07, 2010, 01:12:04 pm »

Hi,
I want to move my Zentyal server to new hardware. Zentyal is configured as PDC domain controller (file server). Is this possible to transfer "PDC data&configuration" to new hw, without losing information of joined workstations (WinXPs), so that I don't have to rejoin all WinXPs?

7

Installation and Upgrades / Re: Traffic Shaping rules ignored

« on: October 06, 2010, 12:28:46 am »

I'm assuming so long as "tc -s class ls dev eth0" and "tc -s class ls dev eth1" (for your Ethernet device names) shows stuff, then I assume you're good.

I have almost the same problem, diffrence is that I'm shaping on interface ppp0. Command tc -s  class show dev ppp0
returns:

Code: [Select]

class htb 1:c00 parent 1:1 leaf c00: prio 7 rate 8bit ceil 65536bit burst 225b cburst 1599b
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
 rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
 tokens: -769803776 ctokens: 3051750

class htb 1:15 parent 1:1 leaf 15: prio 7 rate 524288bit ceil 524288bit burst 1599b cburst 1599b
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
 rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
 tokens: 381468 ctokens: 381468

class htb 1:1 root rate 524288bit ceil 524288bit burst 1599b cburst 1599b
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
 rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
 tokens: 381468 ctokens: 381468All the values are 0 all the time 

8

Installation and Upgrades / Re: ntpd started twice

« on: September 30, 2010, 02:00:15 am »

After some debugging I think that problem is that ntp service is started before connection on ppp0 is established and therefore ntp can't find internet ntp server...

I fix that with restarting ntpd after ppp0 connection is established.
I put

Code: [Select]

# Restart ntpd
/etc/init.d/ebox ntp restartin /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ebox-ppp-up.

9

Installation and Upgrades / Re: ntpd started twice

« on: September 30, 2010, 01:10:08 am »

After some debugging I think that problem is that ntp service is started before connection on ppp0 is established and therefore ntp can't find internet ntp server...

10

Installation and Upgrades / Re: ntpd started twice

« on: September 30, 2010, 12:17:19 am »

Yes, I'm getting a lot of errors in /var/log/daemon.log.

Code: [Select]

Sep 30 00:03:55 gateway ntpd[4963]: process_private: failed auth mod_okay 0
Sep 30 00:03:55 gateway ntpd_initres[4976]: ntpd returns a permission denied error!
Sep 30 00:03:55 gateway ntpd[4963]: process_private: failed auth mod_okay 0
Sep 30 00:03:55 gateway ntpd_initres[4976]: ntpd returns a permission denied error!
Sep 30 00:03:55 gateway ntpd[4963]: process_private: failed auth mod_okay 0
Sep 30 00:03:55 gateway ntpd_initres[4976]: ntpd returns a permission denied error

11

Installation and Upgrades / Re: ntpd started twice

« on: September 29, 2010, 09:01:07 pm »

bump

12

Installation and Upgrades / [SOLVED] ntpd started twice

« on: September 29, 2010, 02:19:43 am »

After reboot ntp service is started twice, once as Zentyal ntp module and once as system service.
I removed system service with

Code: [Select]

update-rc.d -f ntp removeI also reinstall ntp module in Zentyal, but no success.

If manualy stop and start ntp with ebox

Code: [Select]

/etc/init.d/ebox ntp stop
/etc/init.d/ebox ntp startI get

Code: [Select]

ps aux | grep ntpd
root      8818  0.0  0.0   4416  1660 ?        Ss   02:13   0:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -n -g
root      8825  0.0  0.0   4416   516 ?        S    02:13   0:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -n -g
Any suggestions?

13

Installation and Upgrades / Dynamic domain (Dynamic DNS options)

« on: September 07, 2010, 11:14:18 pm »

Hi,
I wonder what is the purpose of Dynamic domain under DHCP > Dynamic DNS options?
Should Dynamic domain automatically provide host names of connected dhcp clients? Or am I wrong?
Well, I try to set-up with Dynamic domain functionality, but I didn't work ?  
This is an example of generated bind configuration /etc/bind/db.local.zzz I got:

Code: [Select]

$ORIGIN .
$TTL 259200     ; 3 days
local.zzz              IN SOA  ns.local.zzz. admin.example.com. (
                                2010090722 ; serial
                                28800      ; refresh (8 hours)
                                7200       ; retry (2 hours)
                                2419200    ; expire (4 weeks)
                                86400      ; minimum (1 day)
                                )
                        NS      ns.local.zzz.
$ORIGIN local.zzz.
$TTL 900        ; 15 minutes
dhcp-192-168-100-59     A       192.168.100.59
                        TXT     "31afeb082c3507946814d58deee2e2d839"
$TTL 259200     ; 3 days
ns                      A       127.0.0.1

As we can see DNS name dhcp-192-168-100-59 is generated name for IP 192.168.100.59.
1. Why isn't this name equal to host name provided by dhcp client?  
2. Also, nslooup dhcp-192-168-100-59 (dig, host) doesn't return IP...