Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
421
Installation and Upgrades / [SOLVED] Re: Add bridge does not work
« on: September 30, 2010, 02:34:40 pm »
I have installed the last Zential Updates wich includes DHCP and DNS and now i can create the bridge without problem.
Wil now test if ddns problem is also solved.
Thanks
Wil now test if ddns problem is also solved.
Thanks
422
Installation and Upgrades / Re: Add bridge does not work
« on: September 30, 2010, 08:19:14 am »
I think the differences with our output is:
-mine is in master mode as expected
-yours is connected to an ap and mine has no active conection
Anyway, i can connect to my wifi with a laptop, but i cant get an ip because in zential, wlan0 is unconfigured and dhcp is not serving thin network.
I think the bridge problem is not related to wifi. Now i have eth0 as my internal network, configured with a static ip and wlan0 unconfigured. If i try to create the bridge in eth0, i get same error.
BTW i have checked my wireless config this way:
I have assigned a static ip fron another range to wlan 0 and i have added a dhcp range to wlan0.
Now i can connect to my wifi, i get an ip and i can ping my server, so the wifi stuff is working as expected.
The problem is with zentian bridged mode.
In command line, i can add a bridge with brctl, but it is not dispayed in zential network connections.
Thanks for your help
-mine is in master mode as expected
-yours is connected to an ap and mine has no active conection
Anyway, i can connect to my wifi with a laptop, but i cant get an ip because in zential, wlan0 is unconfigured and dhcp is not serving thin network.
I think the bridge problem is not related to wifi. Now i have eth0 as my internal network, configured with a static ip and wlan0 unconfigured. If i try to create the bridge in eth0, i get same error.
BTW i have checked my wireless config this way:
I have assigned a static ip fron another range to wlan 0 and i have added a dhcp range to wlan0.
Now i can connect to my wifi, i get an ip and i can ping my server, so the wifi stuff is working as expected.
The problem is with zentian bridged mode.
In command line, i can add a bridge with brctl, but it is not dispayed in zential network connections.
Thanks for your help
423
Installation and Upgrades / Re: Add bridge does not work
« on: September 29, 2010, 06:23:19 pm »
Of course:
Code: [Select]
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11abgn Mode:Master Frequency:2.412 GHz Tx-Power=20 dBm
Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
Power Management:off
424
Installation and Upgrades / Re: Add bridge does not work
« on: September 29, 2010, 03:42:09 pm »
I have modified /etc/network/interfaces from:
"auto lo eth0 eth1" to "auto lo eth0 eth1 wlan0"
I have restarted networking with /etc/init.d/networking restart
Same result adding a bridge.
Note: i get same result when i try to create te bridge from eth0
"auto lo eth0 eth1" to "auto lo eth0 eth1 wlan0"
I have restarted networking with /etc/init.d/networking restart
Same result adding a bridge.
Note: i get same result when i try to create te bridge from eth0
425
Installation and Upgrades / Re: Add bridge does not work
« on: September 29, 2010, 08:42:11 am »
¿? As long as i know, /etc/network/interfaces is generated by the ebox configuration system. You cant edit this file manualy, or if you do it you will lose all the changes during the next ebox config change.
426
Installation and Upgrades / [SOLVED] Add bridge does not work
« on: September 28, 2010, 07:23:49 pm »
I have 1 wan (eth1) interface, 1 lan interface (eth0) and 1 wlan (wlan0) configured to be an access point (hostapd).
I want to bridge eth0 and wlan0, but when i select bridged and new bridge, i get "Dato vacío: interfaz de red" (Empty data: network interface)
¿What's wrong?
I want to bridge eth0 and wlan0, but when i select bridged and new bridge, i get "Dato vacío: interfaz de red" (Empty data: network interface)
¿What's wrong?
427
Installation and Upgrades / IPSEC VPN without firewall rules
« on: September 26, 2010, 11:30:37 am »
I have just configured a pure IPSEC link, joining 2 offices (racoon and setkeys).
I works fine, but i am surprised thar the connection is established without adding any firewall rule.
How is it possible the trafic to remote network is passed without any rule?
Thanks
I works fine, but i am surprised thar the connection is established without adding any firewall rule.
How is it possible the trafic to remote network is passed without any rule?
Thanks
428
Spanish / Re: DDNS y Zentyal
« on: September 21, 2010, 07:23:57 am »
Pues no han solucionado el problema de permisos de apparmor en la 2.0-2 
429
Installation and Upgrades / Re: installing Jinzora using zential postgresql instance
« on: September 14, 2010, 09:21:32 am »
I think the probmen may be with /etc/postgresql/8.4/main/pg_hba.conf.
Here you can authorize connections.
I have added:
Here you can authorize connections.
I have added:
Code: [Select]
host all all 127.0.0.1/32 passwordBut wen i try:Code: [Select]
psql -U jinzoraI getCode: [Select]
psql: FATAL: Ident authentication failed for user "jinzora"So im am out of ideas...430
Installation and Upgrades / installing Jinzora using zential postgresql instance
« on: September 13, 2010, 07:40:36 pm »
Hi,
I am replacing my old linux server with zential.
I need to install Jinzora (www.jinzora.com) in the same server.
Jinzora need a database and can be installed with postgres.
During the web instalation of jinzora, i need to suply a postgres user and password to create and populate the database.
According to my readings, previous versions of zential (ebox) uses socket connections without user/pass.
So i have done:
I have no knowledges of postgres. Can anybody point me in the right direction?
I am replacing my old linux server with zential.
I need to install Jinzora (www.jinzora.com) in the same server.
Jinzora need a database and can be installed with postgres.
During the web instalation of jinzora, i need to suply a postgres user and password to create and populate the database.
According to my readings, previous versions of zential (ebox) uses socket connections without user/pass.
So i have done:
Code: [Select]
sudo su – postgres
createuser --createdb --username postgres --no-createrole --pwprompt jinzora
I suply this username and passw to jinzora installer, but i get error with database creation.I have no knowledges of postgres. Can anybody point me in the right direction?
431
Spanish / Re: DDNS y Zentyal
« on: September 13, 2010, 10:40:55 am »
Ademas, está el tema de los permisos a /etc/bind por apparmor.
Desde hace tiempo, en Ubuntu, el contenido dinamico de /etc/bind ha pasado a /var/lib/bind
Por eso cuando arrancas DHCP con algun dominio ddns, falla por permisos de accesos a un archivo de /etc/bind.
He leido en los bugreports y los posts al respecto, pero de momento he desactivado ddns hasta esperar como lo van a solucionar en la siguente release (2.0-2).
Pueden dar permiso en apparmor a /etc/bind o corregir su sistema para que guarde los archivos en /var/lib/bing. La segunda seria la opcion preferida, estandar en Ubuntu y mas elegante.
Me sigue extrañando que dhcp no pueda registrar concesiones en el dominio principal, solo en un subdominio.
Desde hace tiempo, en Ubuntu, el contenido dinamico de /etc/bind ha pasado a /var/lib/bind
Por eso cuando arrancas DHCP con algun dominio ddns, falla por permisos de accesos a un archivo de /etc/bind.
He leido en los bugreports y los posts al respecto, pero de momento he desactivado ddns hasta esperar como lo van a solucionar en la siguente release (2.0-2).
Pueden dar permiso en apparmor a /etc/bind o corregir su sistema para que guarde los archivos en /var/lib/bing. La segunda seria la opcion preferida, estandar en Ubuntu y mas elegante.
Me sigue extrañando que dhcp no pueda registrar concesiones en el dominio principal, solo en un subdominio.
432
Spanish / Re: servir una pagina con apache
« on: September 09, 2010, 01:18:56 pm »
Solucionado.
Vaya cabeza la mía. No tenia nada que ver con Zentyal. Simle problema de permisos en /var/www/jinzora.
Un saludo a todos.
Vaya cabeza la mía. No tenia nada que ver con Zentyal. Simle problema de permisos en /var/www/jinzora.
Un saludo a todos.
433
Spanish / [solucionado] servir una pagina con apache
« on: September 09, 2010, 12:30:34 pm »
Continuo con la fase de pruebas para sustituir mi servidor actual por zentyal.
Necesito albergar una aplicacion web (jinzora) en php.
Solo necesita apache y php.
Pongo el directorio /var/www/jinzora, pero al acceder a el me da error 403 (prohibido).
En un ubuntu normal, basta con poner la carpeta para poder acceder.
¿Alguna idea de como permitir acceso a un carpeta http://servidor/jinzora ?
Necesito albergar una aplicacion web (jinzora) en php.
Solo necesita apache y php.
Pongo el directorio /var/www/jinzora, pero al acceder a el me da error 403 (prohibido).
En un ubuntu normal, basta con poner la carpeta para poder acceder.
¿Alguna idea de como permitir acceso a un carpeta http://servidor/jinzora ?
434
Spanish / DDNS y Zentyal
« on: September 09, 2010, 08:18:12 am »
Estoy migrando mi servidor basado en debian a zential, para lo cual he montado un servidor de prueba.
En mi servidor actual, tengo configurado DNS y DHCP para que registren por ddns las concesiones del servidor dhcp en midominio.com
Con zentyal, observo que no puedo hacer ddns contra midominio.com, sino que tengo que usar un subdominio sub.midominio.com,
¿Se puede cambiar este comportamiento?
Por lo demás, tiene una pinta estupenda. buen trabajo.
Lastima que me enteré tarde de vuestra fiesta de lanzamiento del nuevo release (soy ZaZ) :-)
En mi servidor actual, tengo configurado DNS y DHCP para que registren por ddns las concesiones del servidor dhcp en midominio.com
Con zentyal, observo que no puedo hacer ddns contra midominio.com, sino que tengo que usar un subdominio sub.midominio.com,
¿Se puede cambiar este comportamiento?
Por lo demás, tiene una pinta estupenda. buen trabajo.
Lastima que me enteré tarde de vuestra fiesta de lanzamiento del nuevo release (soy ZaZ) :-)
435
Installation and Upgrades / Re: Asterisk and Ebox on diferent servers
« on: November 10, 2009, 09:56:43 pm »
Tahnk you all. Gracias
I an now reading all this.
I an now reading all this.