Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
1
Installation and Upgrades / Re: eBox 1.4 slave-sync draining all systems resources
« on: March 10, 2010, 08:36:24 pm »
Also, I can't kill this processes. Nor even with " kill -9". Had to force a reboot.
rgrds,
Bráulio Gergull
rgrds,
Bráulio Gergull
2
Installation and Upgrades / eBox 1.4 slave-sync draining all systems resources
« on: March 10, 2010, 08:28:30 pm »
Hi,
I've setup a new box as standalone (master). There are several slave-sync instances eating all CPU and draining all system resources.
user@proxy:~$ uptime
16:20:36 up 22:19, 4 users, load average: 15.97, 15.23, 12.36
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 25750 0.0 0.0 1768 480 ? Ss 15:40 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 25752 99.9 1.2 16136 13320 ? R 15:40 32:52 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 26036 0.0 0.0 1768 480 ? Ss 15:45 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 26037 0.0 1.2 16136 13324 ? D 15:45 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 27407 0.0 0.0 1768 484 ? Ss 15:50 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 27408 0.0 1.2 16136 13320 ? D 15:50 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 27986 0.0 0.0 1768 476 ? Ss 15:55 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 27987 0.0 1.2 16136 13320 ? D 15:55 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 28306 0.0 0.0 1768 480 ? Ss 16:00 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 28307 0.0 1.2 16136 13320 ? D 16:00 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 28418 0.0 1.2 17488 13464 pts/0 D+ 16:02 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync list
root 28550 0.0 0.0 1768 480 ? Ss 16:05 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 28551 0.0 1.2 16136 13320 ? D 16:05 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
What is this script trying to do since this is a master (standalone) installation?
rgrds,
Bráulio Gergull
I've setup a new box as standalone (master). There are several slave-sync instances eating all CPU and draining all system resources.
user@proxy:~$ uptime
16:20:36 up 22:19, 4 users, load average: 15.97, 15.23, 12.36
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 25750 0.0 0.0 1768 480 ? Ss 15:40 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 25752 99.9 1.2 16136 13320 ? R 15:40 32:52 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 26036 0.0 0.0 1768 480 ? Ss 15:45 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 26037 0.0 1.2 16136 13324 ? D 15:45 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 27407 0.0 0.0 1768 484 ? Ss 15:50 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 27408 0.0 1.2 16136 13320 ? D 15:50 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 27986 0.0 0.0 1768 476 ? Ss 15:55 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 27987 0.0 1.2 16136 13320 ? D 15:55 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 28306 0.0 0.0 1768 480 ? Ss 16:00 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 28307 0.0 1.2 16136 13320 ? D 16:00 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 28418 0.0 1.2 17488 13464 pts/0 D+ 16:02 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync list
root 28550 0.0 0.0 1768 480 ? Ss 16:05 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
root 28551 0.0 1.2 16136 13320 ? D 16:05 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/ebox-usersandgroups/slave-sync
What is this script trying to do since this is a master (standalone) installation?
rgrds,
Bráulio Gergull
3
Installation and Upgrades / Re: dhcp3-client nightmare
« on: March 09, 2010, 07:31:38 pm »
OK,
I went to "Domain Name Server Resolver" (Network -> DNS) and click "show help" and there it states:
"Note that these settings may be overriden if you have any network interface configured via DHCP"
I think there should be a better way to handle this action. If the administrator uses ebox to fix DNS resolvers, most probably he won't want the DHCP client to mess around with /etc/resolv.conf.
Maybe the solution would be to insert some code in /etc/dhcp3/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/ebox-exit to force eBox run the DNS scripts after the lease has been acquired and to recreate /etc/resolv.conf with the defined values.
rgrds,
I went to "Domain Name Server Resolver" (Network -> DNS) and click "show help" and there it states:
"Note that these settings may be overriden if you have any network interface configured via DHCP"
I think there should be a better way to handle this action. If the administrator uses ebox to fix DNS resolvers, most probably he won't want the DHCP client to mess around with /etc/resolv.conf.
Maybe the solution would be to insert some code in /etc/dhcp3/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/ebox-exit to force eBox run the DNS scripts after the lease has been acquired and to recreate /etc/resolv.conf with the defined values.
rgrds,
4
News and Announcements / Re: eBox Platform Virtual Machine images available!
« on: March 09, 2010, 03:11:25 am »
Hi J. A. Calvo,
It would be nice to have VM disk images for Citrix XenServer also.
Rgrds,
Bráulio Gergull
It would be nice to have VM disk images for Citrix XenServer also.
Rgrds,
Bráulio Gergull
5
Installation and Upgrades / Re: dhcp3-client nightmare
« on: March 09, 2010, 02:44:10 am »
Yes. When I configure DNS through eBox and apply the changes the nameservers are saved to /etc/resolv.conf. But it will get overwritten the next time the DHCP interface renew its lease.
6
Installation and Upgrades / dhcp3-client nightmare
« on: March 07, 2010, 05:34:21 am »
Hi All,
I'm having really bad times with dhcp3-client.
I have one eBox installation with 2 internet connections. The main connection is static and the secondary one is DHCP.
The problem is that everitime the secondary renews its lease it overwrites my resolv.conf and erases the main nameservers, then the main connection very unstable.
Most distros, like SuSE and Red Hat, you can simply define PEERDNS=no on the interface configuration so that dhcp client won't touch resolv.conf anymore. But for dhcp3-client there's not such an option.
A workaround would be to use the options "superseed" or "prepend" on /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf, but it has no effect either, since /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf is also overwritten everytime ebox services are restarted.
The only workaround I could come up with was to:
chattr +i /etc/resolv.conf
This is in fact a very dirty and ugly workaround and also after that it's not possible to manage nameservers in eBox.
I wonder if anyone could give advice of a cleanner solution.
Rgrds,
Bráulio Gergull
I'm having really bad times with dhcp3-client.
I have one eBox installation with 2 internet connections. The main connection is static and the secondary one is DHCP.
The problem is that everitime the secondary renews its lease it overwrites my resolv.conf and erases the main nameservers, then the main connection very unstable.
Most distros, like SuSE and Red Hat, you can simply define PEERDNS=no on the interface configuration so that dhcp client won't touch resolv.conf anymore. But for dhcp3-client there's not such an option.
A workaround would be to use the options "superseed" or "prepend" on /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf, but it has no effect either, since /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf is also overwritten everytime ebox services are restarted.
The only workaround I could come up with was to:
chattr +i /etc/resolv.conf
This is in fact a very dirty and ugly workaround and also after that it's not possible to manage nameservers in eBox.
I wonder if anyone could give advice of a cleanner solution.
Rgrds,
Bráulio Gergull
7
Installation and Upgrades / Re: Hardware for PPPoE support in eBox
« on: November 04, 2009, 04:07:18 am »
Netgear WGR614
Dlink DI-524
Dlink DSL-502G
Thompson SpeedTouch 510
Dlink DI-524
Dlink DSL-502G
Thompson SpeedTouch 510
8
Installation and Upgrades / Re: Cant access ebox after checking "External nic" on my internal nic by misstake.
« on: March 26, 2009, 08:46:39 pm »
sudo iptables -F
I think it should do the trick.
rgrds,
Braulio Gergull
I think it should do the trick.
rgrds,
Braulio Gergull
9
Installation and Upgrades / Re: Widgets are not displayed correctly on IE7
« on: March 26, 2009, 08:45:42 pm »
Yes, firefox is OK on WinXP and Linux, and so is Google Chrome 
IE6 and IE7 are broken.
rgrds,
Braulio Gergull
IE6 and IE7 are broken.
rgrds,
Braulio Gergull
10
Installation and Upgrades / Widgets are not displayed correctly on IE7
« on: March 26, 2009, 02:52:06 pm »
Hi,
I´ve just installed v1.0 for testing and I´ve noticed that IE7 does not display the widgets correctly.
I´ve first tried with the Live_CD 1.0 and than with the Installer_CD 1.0. Both presented the same error.
The client machine is WinXP Pro SP3 - IE7 version 7.0.5730.13
I´ve tried adding the ebox URL to the list of intranet sites and set the security level to the lower as possible, but the problem still persists.
Using firefox in a Linux client it is displayed correctly.
I´ve attached a screenshot showing the problem.
rgrds,
Braulio Gergull
I´ve just installed v1.0 for testing and I´ve noticed that IE7 does not display the widgets correctly.
I´ve first tried with the Live_CD 1.0 and than with the Installer_CD 1.0. Both presented the same error.
The client machine is WinXP Pro SP3 - IE7 version 7.0.5730.13
I´ve tried adding the ebox URL to the list of intranet sites and set the security level to the lower as possible, but the problem still persists.
Using firefox in a Linux client it is displayed correctly.
I´ve attached a screenshot showing the problem.
rgrds,
Braulio Gergull
11
News and Announcements / Re: eBox 1.0rc2 ready for testing
« on: March 24, 2009, 02:02:28 am »
Hi,
I see that version 1.0 is available for download, but it hasn't been announced anywhere yet.
Is it final?
rgrds,
I see that version 1.0 is available for download, but it hasn't been announced anywhere yet.
Is it final?
rgrds,
Pages: [1]