Hi jsalamero,
Could you explain more what the exclusion does please?
The effect it has on my 2.2 based system was that it disabled in the gateway view each and all gateways that I had excluded from the balancing.
I had it all setup like this in this order done.
eth0, WAN port setup with an static IP.
Gateways:
fiber, 1, default -> 10.20.0.33 , an existing but not internet routing device
wifi, 2, nondef -> 10.20.0.30 , an existing but not internet routing device
adsl,3, nondef -> 10.20.0.40 , an existing but not internet routing device
gprs,4, nondef -> 10.20.0.1 , an valid internet routing device
traffic balance enabled
-Multigateway rules ON and added these
-http, from any to any via 'fiber'
-HTTP, from any to any via 'fiber'
-http, from any to any via 'wifi'
-HTTP, from any to any via 'wifi'
-WAN failover enabled in the events section
-WAN gateway test on each of the 4 gateways to check an external host
in /etc/zentyal.network.conf added
no_balance_FIBER = yes
no_balance_WIFI = yes
Then I saved, and when that disabled all my gateways I rebooted with same result. After trying some more times the interface also started refusing to save and the log had errors that it could not reach the gateway. From the above I would have expected no issue to save. And I would have expected the non-internet connected routers to become disabled by the system by the WAN test, while I was prevented from surfing and http traffic via the only correct and enabled GPRS gatway.
Finally I reverted all, and had to put the interface back to DHCP to get it working again.
Did I miss something? Please tell more about the no_balance_gwname settings effect.