@famasa
Well said. It seemed to work better in 3.0, so why did they change this?
In 3.0, it didn't take a long time to save changes to the samba module.
In 3.0, if you set up group permissions, Zentyal honored those permissions for shared folders.
In 3.0, the way it worked made sense.
In 3.2, what are the benefits of these changes that are causing all these problems?
The goal should be to make Zentyal shares act exactly like Windows shares. In 3.0, Zentyal was a fairly decent replacement for a windows file server. In 3.2, so far, controlling permissions has been de-abstracted from the web interface it seems.